Privacy violation
Currently, mortgages are not registered with the BKR. Only if there are three months of arrears are mortgages registered in conjunction with arrears. "We wonder what the added value is of further registration. After all, arrears are already registered so that a lender can understand any financial problems. Moreover, there is already a database for mortgages: the Land Registry. Under the BKR's new plans, every affiliated party, from mail order company to telecom provider will be able to see how high your mortgage is or was. Perhaps as far back as years. What good will that lender do with that information? Moreover, a mortgage is different from a "regular" loan. After all, there is collateral with a value in the form of the home. Therefore, for a really clear picture of your debt position, the actual home value and monthly burden would have to be included. Of course, that would be completely insane, a pure violation of privacy."
The active sharing of information about any arrears, as the BKR wants, is also an incomprehensible and undesirable plan. "Of course, there will also be a revenue model behind this, but that aside. We don't quite understand the point of approaching others about a customer's debts. Suppose you are in arrears with T-Mobile and the BKR then notifies ABN Amro about it. In what way can they then help prevent further debt? It's not that you suddenly get a discount from the bank or that they become more lenient. You just have to pay. If necessary, an arrangement can be made, but this can also be done without the so-called signal function of the BKR. Because of the signal function, customers are actually considered suspicious and unsavory with the lender where there are no problems. This can create more psychological pressure and therefore be counterproductive. Sharing information without added value, purely for registration is also a violation of privacy."